How did China develop a precise, scientific, economical, healthy & sustainable approach to deal with covid-19 which some countries attack first, then watch and now start to follow?
中国是如何发展出一套精确、科学、经济、健康和可持续的方法来对付新冠的？针对这套方法，有些国家先是攻击，后来开始观察，现在开始跟随。
您的位置：首页 > 社会社会
中国是如何发展出一套精确、科学、经济、健康和可持续的方法来对付新冠的？针对这套方法，有些国家先是攻击，后来开始观察，现在开始跟随。
How did China develop a precise, scientific, economical, healthy & sustainable approach to deal with covid-19 which some countries attack first, then watch and now start to follow?
2022-05-30
互联网
720
收藏
举报
译文简介
quora网友:基本上，你最好和工程师一起进行长途旅行，而不是和律师、记者或者政客。与银行家进行长途旅行也是有问题的。如果你的车在旅途中抛锚了，工程师会修理它。律师会指责他人。记者将好像已经没有明天一样的开始撒谎。政客会向你要钱，让你接受永远陷入困境的状态，同时说“我太棒了”。银行家会借钱给你（假设你已经有了钱/资产）让你活下去，但他对帮你脱身不感兴趣，因为他现在有机会从你身上赚钱了。
正文翻译
How did China develop a precise, scientific, economical, healthy & sustainable approach to deal with covid-19 which some countries attack first, then watch and now start to follow?
中国是如何发展出一套精确、科学、经济、健康和可持续的方法来对付新冠的？针对这套方法，有些国家先是攻击，后来开始观察，现在开始跟随。
评论翻译
Robin Daverman
Basically you are better off getting on a long road trip with an engineer. Not with a lawyer, or a reporter, or a politician. Questionable to get on a long road trip with a banker.
If your car breaks down on the trip, the engineer is going to fix it. The lawyer will find someone to blame. The reporter will lie like no tomorrow. The politician will ask for money to make you settle for being stuck forever, while saying “I’m so great”. The banker will loan you money (assuming you already have money/asset) to keep you alive, but he’s not interested in helping you unstuck, because he’s got this opportunity right now, to make money off you.
This virus has a maximum 2–week incubation time. 2 weeks! That’s all! Literally if everyone stays home for 2 weeks, you’d know who has it and who doesn’t, without even using any test! Then you keep the infected in isolation, and everybody else can go about do their normal things. Good grief I can’t believe 2 years later, with all the tests and treatment and drugs and vaccines people are still stuck. China, for the entire year, had 2 people die of Covid. 2! And having her economy growing 8%! And doing the most trade in the world!
Countries on a road trip need to have a 9:1 STEM vs. non-STEM ratio to keep moving, imho. The STEM guy can improve the reality. All these other guys, all they know is how to conduct their particular flavor of psych warfare on the driver. Good grief!
基本上，你最好和工程师一起进行长途旅行，而不是和律师、记者或者政客。与银行家进行长途旅行也是有问题的。
如果你的车在旅途中抛锚了，工程师会修理它。律师会指责他人。记者将好像已经没有明天一样的开始撒谎。政客会向你要钱，让你接受永远陷入困境的状态，同时说“我太棒了”。银行家会借钱给你（假设你已经有了钱/资产）让你活下去，但他对帮你脱身不感兴趣，因为他现在有机会从你身上赚钱了。
该病毒最长潜伏期为2周。两周！就这样！如果每个人都呆在家里两周，你就知道谁有谁没有，甚至不用做任何测试！然后你把感染者隔离起来，其他人就可以做他们正常的事情了。
天啊，我真的不敢相信，已经过去2年了，用尽了测试、治疗、药物、疫苗等手段，但是人们依然陷在困境之中。中国全年只有2个人死于新冠病毒。2个！她的经济增长了8%！做了世界上最多的贸易！
恕我直言，STEM与非STEM的比例，起码要9:1才能保证一个国家良好的运行。搞STEM的家伙可以改善现状。而其他的家伙，他们只懂得如何在司机身上进行他们特有的心理战。哎！叹息。
Reine Bautista Mercado
To be fair, China has long prepared itself unintentionally for pandemics through its amazing infrastructure development and love for technological innovation. This is one key to China's success in dealing with covid that many ignore.
For example, the Chinese willingly stayed indoors during the lockdown because they know that their needs will still be met. There would be no shortage of basic supplies because of their infrastructures and the efficiency of their government. They also did not need to go out because they have innovated and improved online shopping years ago. They can have fresh meat and vegetables delivered to them in only a few hours after ordering. There simply was no need to go out.
Of course, all of these innovations are achieved due to the efficiency of their government and that's one thing that they should be mighty proud of. I bet China can even survive a zombie apocalypse.
平心而论，长期以来，中国通过惊人的基础设施建设和对技术创新的热爱，在无意中为流行病做好了准备。这是中国成功应对许多人忽视的新冠病毒的关键之一。
例如，在封锁期间，中国人愿意呆在室内，因为他们知道他们的需求仍然会得到满足。由于其基础设施和政府的效率，基本供应不会短缺。他们也不需要外出，因为多年前他们已经创新并改进了网上购物。他们可以在订购后的几个小时内将新鲜肉类和蔬菜送到他们手中。根本没有必要出去。
当然，所有这些创新都是由于他们政府的效率而实现的，这是他们可以非常自豪的一件事。我打赌中国甚至可以在《僵尸启示录》中幸存下来。
Yevgeniy Leto
Yes, the engineer not only fixes your car, but also delivers groceries to you.
是的，工程师不仅修理你的汽车，而且还给你送食品。
Dongxu Li
Please no zombie apocalypse… I’m in deep worry of WW3 and I really don’t want to live in a zombie world from those TV series.
Chinese governments have to work harder and improve faster in order to revive China back to where it’s supposed to be. There is a long way to go but not much room for serious mistakes.
:-)
不想要《僵尸启示录》……我对第三次世界大战深感担忧，我真的不想生活在电视连续剧中表演的丧尸世界中。
中国政府必须更加努力，更快地改善，以使中国恢复到应有的水平。我们还有很长的路要走，但犯严重错误的可能性不大。
:-)
Paul Denlinger
My theory is that there are two general profession types for people: the world of words and the world of numbers.
Most people prefer the world of words, especially if they live in the US and the west.
Lawyers are not good at numbers except when it comes to counting your money.
Reporters are not good at numbers, period.
Politicians in the US are not good at numbers except when it comes to raising money for their next campaign. They don’t need to be good with other numbers because it is all other peoples’ money.
Engineers are good at numbers because they need to quantify things.
Data is mostly numbers. If it is not a number, it gets resolved to a number if it lives on a computer or on the Internet.
So all data are numbers.
That means that data is getting more important, and words are getting less important.
Guess which world is going to win in the end? Guess which world is getting irrelevant?
我的理论是人们有两种职业类型：文字世界和数字世界。
大多数人更喜欢文字世界，尤其是生活在美国和西方的人们。
律师不擅长数字，除非是数你的钱。
记者不擅长数字，就是这样。
美国政客不擅长数字，除非是在为下一次竞选筹集资金时。他们不需要与其他数字打交道，因为这是所有其他人的钱。
工程师擅长数字，因为他们需要量化事物。
数据主要是数字。如果它不是一个数字，那么如果它存放在计算机或互联网上，它就会被解析为一个数字。
所以所有的数据都是数字。
这意味着数据变得越来越重要，而文字变得越来越不重要。
猜猜最后哪个世界会赢？猜猜哪个世界会变得无关紧要？
David Urmaster
A small correction to your answer: This virus has more than “a maximum 2-week incubation time”. In fact, even during the relatively early part of the pandemic (early 2020), there were known cases of incubation times that lasted for up to a month, though they comprised only a small minority of all cases. By now, we have been hearing about more known cases with incubation times that have lasted 3 or 4 weeks, which is probably why recent COVID quarantine times for some international arrivals to China have been 28 days or at least 21 days.
对你的答案有一个小小的修正：这种病毒有超过“最长2周的潜伏期”。事实上，即使在大流行的相对早期（2020年初），也有一些已知的潜伏期长达一个月的病例，尽管它们只占所有病例的一小部分。到目前为止，我们已经听到更多的已知病例，有的潜伏期持续了3或4周，这可能就是为什么最近一些国际入境者到中国的新冠病毒检疫时间为28天或至少21天。
Neale Johns
Even though your answer has some validity, in the world of human beings it’s called “nit picking”.
In the scheme of things China showed how it’s done and continues to do so.
尽管你的答案有一定的正确性，但在人类的世界里，这被称为“吹毛求疵”。
在事态发展中，中国展示了它是如何做到的，并将继续这样做。
David Urmaster
Your reply not only failed to correctly note that my answer has not just “some validity” but all of the validity for the point that it was intended to make and did make, but also failed to observe the fact that I had already made clear that it was a “small correction” from the start. In the world of human beings it’s called “lack of reading comprehension” and “being triggered”. The rest of your response is irrelevant to mine.
你的答复不仅没有正确地指出，我的答复不仅“有些正确”，而且对它打算提出和确实提出的观点都是正确的，而且没有注意到我从一开始就已经明确表示这是一个“小的更正”。在人类的世界里，它被称为“缺乏阅读理解能力”和“被动触发”。你其余的回答与我无关。
Joseph Wang
The big reason was that we went through this all with SARS in 2003. After SARS, people looked at the mistakes that were made, and started preparing for the next epidemic. You had some near misses like MERS and bird flu, but it was only a matter of time before a pandemic happened.
Part of the reason everything worked is that you had a group of scientist-politicians that were trusted by both the politicians and the scientists. Also China established a very clear chain of command, and it turns out that the mass mobilization while terrible for running an economy turns out to be great for dealing with an epidemic.
One thing about Western response is that people talked about a false choice between economic growth and epidemic control. China made the decision to absolutely wreck the economy for one quarter.
One problem with Western response is that over the last few decades, there has been too much power moving from things like public health to the markets.
One thing that the West did an excellent job at was dealing with the economic fallout from COVID. Western economies were on the verge of collapse in March 2020, and the central banks and legislatures did a very good job at responding to the economic fallout, and one wishes that the CDC were able to respond to the crisis as well as the Federal Reserve did.
However, this shows that people have been spending too much money on investment bankers and too little money on public health.
One final thing is that Western countries were a bit arrogant and absolutely obsessed with making China look bad. There have been a lot of cases over the last two years when Western nations have looked down on China, talked about how bad and incompetent China was, and then a few weeks later found themselves in a big mess. One problem with Trump was that Trump was so obsessed with making him look good and making China look bad that this ate into having to deal with the pandemic.
主要原因是我们在2003年经历了这一切。非典过后，人们看到了所犯的错误，并开始为下一次疫情做准备。你曾有过一些类似MERS和禽流感的未遂事件，但大流行发生只是时间问题。
让一切运行正常的一部分原因是，我们有一群科学家和政治家，他们彼此互相信任。此外，中国还建立了一个非常明确的指挥系统，结果证明，限制群众流动虽然对经济运行很糟糕，但对应对疫情却很有帮助。
对于西方的反应，其中之一是人们在辩论经济增长和控制疫情谁更重要的时候，做出了错误的选择。中国做出了牺牲四份之一的经济来控制疫情的决定。
西方反应出来的另一个问题是，公共卫生等领域有太多的权力转移到市场经济。
西方在处理新冠疫情的经济影响方面做得非常出色。2020年3月，西方经济体处于崩溃的边缘，各国央行和立法机构在应对经济后果方面做得非常好，人们希望CDC能够像美联储那样应对危机。
然而，这表明人们在投资银行家身上花的钱太多了，而在公共卫生上花的钱太少了。
最后一件事是，西方国家有点傲慢，完全痴迷于让中国看起来很糟糕。在过去的两年里，西方国家看不起中国，谈论中国是多么糟糕和无能，然后几个星期后发现自己陷入了一片混乱。特朗普的一个问题是，特朗普如此痴迷于让自己看起来不错，让中国看起来不好，以至于不得不应对这场流行病。
Gloucera Wingardium
Trump is especially disappointing, especially since he was an authoritarian.
It’s well known that at this one particular moment in history. democracy isn’t the best way to fight the pandemic.
So what really should have been done, is for Trump to go all fire and fury on this virus.
Trump shut the government down before. He can shut the USA down.
Trump’s supporters worship him as god. Their god can tell them to shoot lockdown breakers and those MAGAts will.
Trump can get the National Guard to build hospitals within weeks and they will.
Trump can put people up in his hotels and get it done.
Trump could do everything China did. And then drag the court cases out typical politician style. Smear every Democrat voicing out about his attacks on democracy as pro-Virus. Watch the left tear the rest of the Democrats apart because Trump is for once following the science. ‘I can’t believe I am agreeing with Donald Trump!’
Trump, with more tools than a regular US president, failed.
特朗普尤其令人失望，尤其是他还是一位极权主义者。
众所周知，在历史上的这个特殊时刻。民主并不是对抗这种流行病的最佳方式。
因此，特朗普真正应该做的是对这种病毒全力以赴。
特朗普此前关闭了政府。他可以封锁美国。
特朗普的支持者崇拜他为上帝。他们的上帝可以告诉他们击毙封锁破坏者，那些MAGA可以做到的。
特朗普可以让国民警卫队在几周内建造医院，而且他们可以做到的。
特朗普可以让人们住在他的酒店里，并完成这项工作。
特朗普可以做中国所做的一切。然后牵扯出典型的政治家风格的法庭案例，诋毁那些说他在攻击民主的民主党人是亲病毒的。看着左派把其余的民主党人撕成两半，因为特朗普这一次是追随科学的。“我不敢相信我居然同意唐纳德·特朗普的观点”
拥有比普通美国总统更多工具的特朗普失败了。
Joseph Wang
Pretty much. The thing is that Trump is a master salesman. He can get people to get shots, wear masks, and follow quarantine.
Things could have easily gone very differently. If you had someone like Xi in Washington and someone like Trump in Beijing, the world would be a completely different place.
和你的想法差不多。特朗普是一位出色的推销员。他本来可以让人们去打针，戴口罩，跟踪隔离。
事情本来很容易就会大不一样的。如果在华盛顿有像中国那样的领导，而在北京有特朗普那样的领导，世界将会完全不同。
Gloucera Wingardium
Very different, and in such a world we would be right to fear China. In such a China we’d have 700 million people trying to escape and 700 million ultranationalists. Both would cause chaos for the rest of the world.
将会非常不同，在那样一个世界里，我们害怕中国会是正确的。因为，在那个世界的中国，将有7亿人试图逃离，还会产生7亿极端民族主义者。两者都会给世界其他地区带来混乱。
Mel Victor
That's why the democratic system will ruin China. The Chinese logically and instinctively knows this. All this sales talk of Freedom of Speech and Human Rights left the Chinese unmoved. Thank god for that
这就是为什么民主制度会毁掉中国。中国人从逻辑和本能上都知道这一点。所有这些关于言论自由和人权的推销言论都让中国人无动于衷。感谢上帝。
Da Chin Lim
1) government competence and 2) the level of trust citizens have in the government though the two factors are obviously highly correlated. Government enacts good and easy to understand control measures and the people trust the government enough to listen.
1）政府能力和2）公民对政府的信任程度，这两个因素高度相关。政府制定了良好且易于理解的控制措施，民众对政府的信任程度足以让他们倾听。
Tony Lee
It's proven that the Chinese style democracy and CCP value their own people's lives more than anything else.
The US style democratic nonsensical regime doesn't even value their own people's lives and health, and treat their own million of citizens’ lives as garbages, saying nothing of protecting human rights.
China has only 1 death of covid-19 since May last year 2020. The model of the world to protect people's lives, uphold the human rights and freedom, keep good sustainable GDP growths and maintain a healthy and prosperous society.
China is the model for the world to follow.
The US should learn from China on how to protect their own citizens' lives , treat their own citizens as human beings, especially the minorities first, then talk about the human rights, democracy, freedom etc. later on.
Without human lives, where are the human rights?
Without people's health, where are the people's freedom?
事实证明，中国式的民主和中共最看重自己人民的生命。
美国式的民主荒谬政权甚至不重视本国人民的生命和健康，把本国数百万公民的生命当作垃圾，更不用说保护人权了。
中国自2020年5月以来只有1例死亡。保护人民生命、维护人权和自由、保持良好的可持续GDP增长和保持健康繁荣社会的世界典范。
中国是世界效仿的榜样。
美国应该向中国学习如何保护本国公民的生命，先把本国公民，特别是少数民族当作人来对待，然后再谈人权、民主、自由等。
没有生命，人权何在？
没有人民的健康，人民的自由何在？
Zhuzi
First, China had been through the debacle of SARS when she was caught unprepared in 2003. She learned from the painful experience, and vowed never again to let a virus destroy people’s lives.
Second, Chinese leaders are a cohesive group. They can put aside personal differences and work together for the good of the nation.
Third, the Chinese government firmly trusted scientific experts on ways to deal with the pandemic.
Fourth, Chinese government was decisive. To protect lives, she listened to scientific advice and determined, at lightning speed, to shut down an entire city of 11 million people regardless of economic and other costs. Life is of supreme importance to Chinese leaders. The cost included facing unkind accusations from the West that she violated human rights. The shutting down of Wuhan City was a feat never happened to mankind before.
Fifth, Chinese people is a cohesive lot. When mobilised and ordered, people stayed at home. They wore masks whenever they need to leave the house to stock up daily necessities for the household.
Sixth, thousands of medical personnel from across the country, risking personal safety, rushed to Wuhan, the epicentre of the pandemic during the early days, to help the city's hospitals handle the thousands of cases.
Seventh, thousands of construction personnel raced against time to construct the 1000-bed Huoshenshan Infectious Disease Hospital 火神山新型冠状病毒感染肺炎专科医院 in a mere 10 days. A world’s first!
Eighth, Chinese TCM doctors worked along-side their western medical colleagues in treating COVID-19 patients. TCM herbal treatments had been proven effective.
Nineth, Chinese leaders did not shy away from admitting shortcomings in the handling of the pandemic. Even with their trying their personal and collective best, errors and misjudgments still occured. They documented the whole episode and learned from it, vowinig to do better the next time.
Tenth, when China was first under seige by the coronavirus in December 2019, she was almost alone in the fight. The western world was watching the development with glee, hoping that would destroy China’s growth, or at least, retard it. Fortunately, decades of facing hostilies and denials of assistance and cooperation from the West had strengthed China’s fortitude and resilience. When one searches the web today, he or she will still find hundreds of western media news and video clips mocking China with all kinds of accusastions and suspicious conspiracy theories.
Today, in Noverber 2021, while some parts of the world are still inundated by the coronavirus, China stands alone.
Has China vindicated herself sufficiently?
首先，中国经历了SARS，2003年她措手不及。她从痛苦的经历中吸取了教训，并发誓再也不会让病毒摧毁人们的生命。
第二，中国人是一个有凝聚力的群体。他们可以抛开个人差异，为国家的利益而共同努力。
第三，中国政府坚定地相信科学专家，如何应对这一流行病。
第四，中国政府是果断的。为了保护生命，她听取了科学建议，并决心以闪电般的速度关闭一座拥有1100万人口的城市，而不考虑经济和其他成本。对中国领导人来说，生命至关重要。代价包括面临西方对她侵犯人权的无情指控。关闭武汉市是人类从未有过的壮举。
第五，中国人很有凝聚力。动员和命令时，人们呆在家里。他们需要出门时都戴着口罩为家庭储备日用品。
第六，来自全国各地的数千名医务人员冒着人身安全的危险，赶赴武汉，帮助该市医院处理数千例病例。武汉是疫情早期的中心。
第七，数千名施工人员争分夺秒地在短短10天内建造了拥有1000张病床的火神山新型冠状病毒感染肺炎专科医院。 世界第一！
第八、新冠的中医药治疗，与中医同仁共同治疗。中医中药疗法已被证明是有效的。
第九，中国人毫不避讳地承认在应对疫情方面存在缺陷。即使他们尽了个人和集体的最大努力，错误和误判仍在发生。他们记录了整个事件并从中吸取教训，发誓下次会做得更好。
第十，2019年12月，当中国首次遭受冠状病毒袭击时，她几乎是孤军奋战。西方世界兴高采烈地注视着事态的发展，希望这会破坏中国的增长，或者至少会阻碍中国的增长。幸运的是，几十年来，面对来自西方的敌对和拒绝援助与合作，中国的坚韧不拔和韧性得到了增强。当你今天在网上搜索时，他或她仍然会发现数百条西方媒体的新闻和视频片段，用各种指责和可疑的阴谋论嘲弄中国。
今天，2021年11月，尽管世界上一些地区仍然被新冠所淹没，但中国却独自站着。
中国是否充分证明了自己的正确性？
David Bivans
Im not a fan of communism at all, but they did the right thing and followed the advice of the scientists.
They have shown that science works and stupidity does not.
我一点也不喜欢共产主义，但他们做了正确的事情，听从了科学家的建议。
他们已经证明，科学是有效的，而愚蠢是无效的。
Michael Ciao
It seemed elementary, humankind has done the same with all contagious diseases many times in 1,000s of years. You isolate the sick away from the healthy. You lock yourself at home so you don’t get in contact with the sick people.
What was puzzling was how come other countries didn’t know that? All regions of the world had similar experiences in the past.
这似乎很简单，人类在1000年的时间里对所有传染病都做了很多次同样的事情。你把病人和健康人隔离开来。你把自己锁在家里，这样你就不会和病人接触。
令人不解的是，为什么其他国家不知道这一点？世界所有区域过去都有类似的经历。
Tobias Jonch
The only innovative part of China’s handling of the pandemic was to forcefully quarantine their citizens by welding their doors shut, and I don’t believe any other country was inspired to follow suit.
中国应对流感大流行的唯一创新之处是通过关上门强制隔离本国公民，我不相信任何其他国家也会效仿。
Qi Chen
Or, you know, they also frozen any loan payments by the quarantine citizens.
Or, you know, they also mass tested the entire potentially infected region, down to the last individual.
Or, you know, they immediate informed all the individual in a community if even a single case showed up near their place.
Or, you know, they have check points and big data record of public movement, which means the moment someone is infected, they can track down who was in contact with that person over the past few days.
“Not capable and doesn’t have care enough” is quite different from “I don’t believe any other country was inspired to follow suit”.
或者，你应该知道，他们给被隔离公民提供了还款延期服务。
或者，你应该知道，他们还大规模测试了整个可能感染的区域，直到最后一个人。
或者，你应该知道，他们会立即通知社区中的所有人，即使只有一个病例出现在他们家附近。
或者，你应该知道，他们有检查点和公众运动的大数据记录，这意味着一旦有人被感染，他们就可以追查过去几天与此人接触的人。
“没有能力，也没有足够的关心”与“我不相信任何其他国家也会效仿”是完全不同的。
XueCheng Zhu
Yes, China has only done its part, and most countries have made a mess of the most basic ones.
是的，中国只做了自己该做的，大多数国家把最基本的部分搞得一团糟。
Richy T
Based on science, but not religious belief like the US.
基于科学，而不像美国那样基于宗教信仰。
原文地址：https://www.quora.com/How-did-China-develop-a-precise-scientific-economical-healthy-sustainable-approach-to-deal-with-covid-19-which-some-countries-attack-first-then-watch-and-now-start-to-follow
Basically you are better off getting on a long road trip with an engineer. Not with a lawyer, or a reporter, or a politician. Questionable to get on a long road trip with a banker.
If your car breaks down on the trip, the engineer is going to fix it. The lawyer will find someone to blame. The reporter will lie like no tomorrow. The politician will ask for money to make you settle for being stuck forever, while saying “I’m so great”. The banker will loan you money (assuming you already have money/asset) to keep you alive, but he’s not interested in helping you unstuck, because he’s got this opportunity right now, to make money off you.
This virus has a maximum 2–week incubation time. 2 weeks! That’s all! Literally if everyone stays home for 2 weeks, you’d know who has it and who doesn’t, without even using any test! Then you keep the infected in isolation, and everybody else can go about do their normal things. Good grief I can’t believe 2 years later, with all the tests and treatment and drugs and vaccines people are still stuck. China, for the entire year, had 2 people die of Covid. 2! And having her economy growing 8%! And doing the most trade in the world!
Countries on a road trip need to have a 9:1 STEM vs. non-STEM ratio to keep moving, imho. The STEM guy can improve the reality. All these other guys, all they know is how to conduct their particular flavor of psych warfare on the driver. Good grief!
基本上，你最好和工程师一起进行长途旅行，而不是和律师、记者或者政客。与银行家进行长途旅行也是有问题的。
如果你的车在旅途中抛锚了，工程师会修理它。律师会指责他人。记者将好像已经没有明天一样的开始撒谎。政客会向你要钱，让你接受永远陷入困境的状态，同时说“我太棒了”。银行家会借钱给你（假设你已经有了钱/资产）让你活下去，但他对帮你脱身不感兴趣，因为他现在有机会从你身上赚钱了。
该病毒最长潜伏期为2周。两周！就这样！如果每个人都呆在家里两周，你就知道谁有谁没有，甚至不用做任何测试！然后你把感染者隔离起来，其他人就可以做他们正常的事情了。
天啊，我真的不敢相信，已经过去2年了，用尽了测试、治疗、药物、疫苗等手段，但是人们依然陷在困境之中。中国全年只有2个人死于新冠病毒。2个！她的经济增长了8%！做了世界上最多的贸易！
恕我直言，STEM与非STEM的比例，起码要9:1才能保证一个国家良好的运行。搞STEM的家伙可以改善现状。而其他的家伙，他们只懂得如何在司机身上进行他们特有的心理战。哎！叹息。
Reine Bautista Mercado
To be fair, China has long prepared itself unintentionally for pandemics through its amazing infrastructure development and love for technological innovation. This is one key to China's success in dealing with covid that many ignore.
For example, the Chinese willingly stayed indoors during the lockdown because they know that their needs will still be met. There would be no shortage of basic supplies because of their infrastructures and the efficiency of their government. They also did not need to go out because they have innovated and improved online shopping years ago. They can have fresh meat and vegetables delivered to them in only a few hours after ordering. There simply was no need to go out.
Of course, all of these innovations are achieved due to the efficiency of their government and that's one thing that they should be mighty proud of. I bet China can even survive a zombie apocalypse.
平心而论，长期以来，中国通过惊人的基础设施建设和对技术创新的热爱，在无意中为流行病做好了准备。这是中国成功应对许多人忽视的新冠病毒的关键之一。
例如，在封锁期间，中国人愿意呆在室内，因为他们知道他们的需求仍然会得到满足。由于其基础设施和政府的效率，基本供应不会短缺。他们也不需要外出，因为多年前他们已经创新并改进了网上购物。他们可以在订购后的几个小时内将新鲜肉类和蔬菜送到他们手中。根本没有必要出去。
当然，所有这些创新都是由于他们政府的效率而实现的，这是他们可以非常自豪的一件事。我打赌中国甚至可以在《僵尸启示录》中幸存下来。
Yevgeniy Leto
Yes, the engineer not only fixes your car, but also delivers groceries to you.
是的，工程师不仅修理你的汽车，而且还给你送食品。
Dongxu Li
Please no zombie apocalypse… I’m in deep worry of WW3 and I really don’t want to live in a zombie world from those TV series.
Chinese governments have to work harder and improve faster in order to revive China back to where it’s supposed to be. There is a long way to go but not much room for serious mistakes.
:-)
不想要《僵尸启示录》……我对第三次世界大战深感担忧，我真的不想生活在电视连续剧中表演的丧尸世界中。
中国政府必须更加努力，更快地改善，以使中国恢复到应有的水平。我们还有很长的路要走，但犯严重错误的可能性不大。
:-)
Paul Denlinger
My theory is that there are two general profession types for people: the world of words and the world of numbers.
Most people prefer the world of words, especially if they live in the US and the west.
Lawyers are not good at numbers except when it comes to counting your money.
Reporters are not good at numbers, period.
Politicians in the US are not good at numbers except when it comes to raising money for their next campaign. They don’t need to be good with other numbers because it is all other peoples’ money.
Engineers are good at numbers because they need to quantify things.
Data is mostly numbers. If it is not a number, it gets resolved to a number if it lives on a computer or on the Internet.
So all data are numbers.
That means that data is getting more important, and words are getting less important.
Guess which world is going to win in the end? Guess which world is getting irrelevant?
我的理论是人们有两种职业类型：文字世界和数字世界。
大多数人更喜欢文字世界，尤其是生活在美国和西方的人们。
律师不擅长数字，除非是数你的钱。
记者不擅长数字，就是这样。
美国政客不擅长数字，除非是在为下一次竞选筹集资金时。他们不需要与其他数字打交道，因为这是所有其他人的钱。
工程师擅长数字，因为他们需要量化事物。
数据主要是数字。如果它不是一个数字，那么如果它存放在计算机或互联网上，它就会被解析为一个数字。
所以所有的数据都是数字。
这意味着数据变得越来越重要，而文字变得越来越不重要。
猜猜最后哪个世界会赢？猜猜哪个世界会变得无关紧要？
David Urmaster
A small correction to your answer: This virus has more than “a maximum 2-week incubation time”. In fact, even during the relatively early part of the pandemic (early 2020), there were known cases of incubation times that lasted for up to a month, though they comprised only a small minority of all cases. By now, we have been hearing about more known cases with incubation times that have lasted 3 or 4 weeks, which is probably why recent COVID quarantine times for some international arrivals to China have been 28 days or at least 21 days.
对你的答案有一个小小的修正：这种病毒有超过“最长2周的潜伏期”。事实上，即使在大流行的相对早期（2020年初），也有一些已知的潜伏期长达一个月的病例，尽管它们只占所有病例的一小部分。到目前为止，我们已经听到更多的已知病例，有的潜伏期持续了3或4周，这可能就是为什么最近一些国际入境者到中国的新冠病毒检疫时间为28天或至少21天。
Neale Johns
Even though your answer has some validity, in the world of human beings it’s called “nit picking”.
In the scheme of things China showed how it’s done and continues to do so.
尽管你的答案有一定的正确性，但在人类的世界里，这被称为“吹毛求疵”。
在事态发展中，中国展示了它是如何做到的，并将继续这样做。
David Urmaster
Your reply not only failed to correctly note that my answer has not just “some validity” but all of the validity for the point that it was intended to make and did make, but also failed to observe the fact that I had already made clear that it was a “small correction” from the start. In the world of human beings it’s called “lack of reading comprehension” and “being triggered”. The rest of your response is irrelevant to mine.
你的答复不仅没有正确地指出，我的答复不仅“有些正确”，而且对它打算提出和确实提出的观点都是正确的，而且没有注意到我从一开始就已经明确表示这是一个“小的更正”。在人类的世界里，它被称为“缺乏阅读理解能力”和“被动触发”。你其余的回答与我无关。
Joseph Wang
The big reason was that we went through this all with SARS in 2003. After SARS, people looked at the mistakes that were made, and started preparing for the next epidemic. You had some near misses like MERS and bird flu, but it was only a matter of time before a pandemic happened.
Part of the reason everything worked is that you had a group of scientist-politicians that were trusted by both the politicians and the scientists. Also China established a very clear chain of command, and it turns out that the mass mobilization while terrible for running an economy turns out to be great for dealing with an epidemic.
One thing about Western response is that people talked about a false choice between economic growth and epidemic control. China made the decision to absolutely wreck the economy for one quarter.
One problem with Western response is that over the last few decades, there has been too much power moving from things like public health to the markets.
One thing that the West did an excellent job at was dealing with the economic fallout from COVID. Western economies were on the verge of collapse in March 2020, and the central banks and legislatures did a very good job at responding to the economic fallout, and one wishes that the CDC were able to respond to the crisis as well as the Federal Reserve did.
However, this shows that people have been spending too much money on investment bankers and too little money on public health.
One final thing is that Western countries were a bit arrogant and absolutely obsessed with making China look bad. There have been a lot of cases over the last two years when Western nations have looked down on China, talked about how bad and incompetent China was, and then a few weeks later found themselves in a big mess. One problem with Trump was that Trump was so obsessed with making him look good and making China look bad that this ate into having to deal with the pandemic.
主要原因是我们在2003年经历了这一切。非典过后，人们看到了所犯的错误，并开始为下一次疫情做准备。你曾有过一些类似MERS和禽流感的未遂事件，但大流行发生只是时间问题。
让一切运行正常的一部分原因是，我们有一群科学家和政治家，他们彼此互相信任。此外，中国还建立了一个非常明确的指挥系统，结果证明，限制群众流动虽然对经济运行很糟糕，但对应对疫情却很有帮助。
对于西方的反应，其中之一是人们在辩论经济增长和控制疫情谁更重要的时候，做出了错误的选择。中国做出了牺牲四份之一的经济来控制疫情的决定。
西方反应出来的另一个问题是，公共卫生等领域有太多的权力转移到市场经济。
西方在处理新冠疫情的经济影响方面做得非常出色。2020年3月，西方经济体处于崩溃的边缘，各国央行和立法机构在应对经济后果方面做得非常好，人们希望CDC能够像美联储那样应对危机。
然而，这表明人们在投资银行家身上花的钱太多了，而在公共卫生上花的钱太少了。
最后一件事是，西方国家有点傲慢，完全痴迷于让中国看起来很糟糕。在过去的两年里，西方国家看不起中国，谈论中国是多么糟糕和无能，然后几个星期后发现自己陷入了一片混乱。特朗普的一个问题是，特朗普如此痴迷于让自己看起来不错，让中国看起来不好，以至于不得不应对这场流行病。
Gloucera Wingardium
Trump is especially disappointing, especially since he was an authoritarian.
It’s well known that at this one particular moment in history. democracy isn’t the best way to fight the pandemic.
So what really should have been done, is for Trump to go all fire and fury on this virus.
Trump shut the government down before. He can shut the USA down.
Trump’s supporters worship him as god. Their god can tell them to shoot lockdown breakers and those MAGAts will.
Trump can get the National Guard to build hospitals within weeks and they will.
Trump can put people up in his hotels and get it done.
Trump could do everything China did. And then drag the court cases out typical politician style. Smear every Democrat voicing out about his attacks on democracy as pro-Virus. Watch the left tear the rest of the Democrats apart because Trump is for once following the science. ‘I can’t believe I am agreeing with Donald Trump!’
Trump, with more tools than a regular US president, failed.
特朗普尤其令人失望，尤其是他还是一位极权主义者。
众所周知，在历史上的这个特殊时刻。民主并不是对抗这种流行病的最佳方式。
因此，特朗普真正应该做的是对这种病毒全力以赴。
特朗普此前关闭了政府。他可以封锁美国。
特朗普的支持者崇拜他为上帝。他们的上帝可以告诉他们击毙封锁破坏者，那些MAGA可以做到的。
特朗普可以让国民警卫队在几周内建造医院，而且他们可以做到的。
特朗普可以让人们住在他的酒店里，并完成这项工作。
特朗普可以做中国所做的一切。然后牵扯出典型的政治家风格的法庭案例，诋毁那些说他在攻击民主的民主党人是亲病毒的。看着左派把其余的民主党人撕成两半，因为特朗普这一次是追随科学的。“我不敢相信我居然同意唐纳德·特朗普的观点”
拥有比普通美国总统更多工具的特朗普失败了。
Joseph Wang
Pretty much. The thing is that Trump is a master salesman. He can get people to get shots, wear masks, and follow quarantine.
Things could have easily gone very differently. If you had someone like Xi in Washington and someone like Trump in Beijing, the world would be a completely different place.
和你的想法差不多。特朗普是一位出色的推销员。他本来可以让人们去打针，戴口罩，跟踪隔离。
事情本来很容易就会大不一样的。如果在华盛顿有像中国那样的领导，而在北京有特朗普那样的领导，世界将会完全不同。
Gloucera Wingardium
Very different, and in such a world we would be right to fear China. In such a China we’d have 700 million people trying to escape and 700 million ultranationalists. Both would cause chaos for the rest of the world.
将会非常不同，在那样一个世界里，我们害怕中国会是正确的。因为，在那个世界的中国，将有7亿人试图逃离，还会产生7亿极端民族主义者。两者都会给世界其他地区带来混乱。
Mel Victor
That's why the democratic system will ruin China. The Chinese logically and instinctively knows this. All this sales talk of Freedom of Speech and Human Rights left the Chinese unmoved. Thank god for that
这就是为什么民主制度会毁掉中国。中国人从逻辑和本能上都知道这一点。所有这些关于言论自由和人权的推销言论都让中国人无动于衷。感谢上帝。
Da Chin Lim
1) government competence and 2) the level of trust citizens have in the government though the two factors are obviously highly correlated. Government enacts good and easy to understand control measures and the people trust the government enough to listen.
1）政府能力和2）公民对政府的信任程度，这两个因素高度相关。政府制定了良好且易于理解的控制措施，民众对政府的信任程度足以让他们倾听。
Tony Lee
It's proven that the Chinese style democracy and CCP value their own people's lives more than anything else.
The US style democratic nonsensical regime doesn't even value their own people's lives and health, and treat their own million of citizens’ lives as garbages, saying nothing of protecting human rights.
China has only 1 death of covid-19 since May last year 2020. The model of the world to protect people's lives, uphold the human rights and freedom, keep good sustainable GDP growths and maintain a healthy and prosperous society.
China is the model for the world to follow.
The US should learn from China on how to protect their own citizens' lives , treat their own citizens as human beings, especially the minorities first, then talk about the human rights, democracy, freedom etc. later on.
Without human lives, where are the human rights?
Without people's health, where are the people's freedom?
事实证明，中国式的民主和中共最看重自己人民的生命。
美国式的民主荒谬政权甚至不重视本国人民的生命和健康，把本国数百万公民的生命当作垃圾，更不用说保护人权了。
中国自2020年5月以来只有1例死亡。保护人民生命、维护人权和自由、保持良好的可持续GDP增长和保持健康繁荣社会的世界典范。
中国是世界效仿的榜样。
美国应该向中国学习如何保护本国公民的生命，先把本国公民，特别是少数民族当作人来对待，然后再谈人权、民主、自由等。
没有生命，人权何在？
没有人民的健康，人民的自由何在？
Zhuzi
First, China had been through the debacle of SARS when she was caught unprepared in 2003. She learned from the painful experience, and vowed never again to let a virus destroy people’s lives.
Second, Chinese leaders are a cohesive group. They can put aside personal differences and work together for the good of the nation.
Third, the Chinese government firmly trusted scientific experts on ways to deal with the pandemic.
Fourth, Chinese government was decisive. To protect lives, she listened to scientific advice and determined, at lightning speed, to shut down an entire city of 11 million people regardless of economic and other costs. Life is of supreme importance to Chinese leaders. The cost included facing unkind accusations from the West that she violated human rights. The shutting down of Wuhan City was a feat never happened to mankind before.
Fifth, Chinese people is a cohesive lot. When mobilised and ordered, people stayed at home. They wore masks whenever they need to leave the house to stock up daily necessities for the household.
Sixth, thousands of medical personnel from across the country, risking personal safety, rushed to Wuhan, the epicentre of the pandemic during the early days, to help the city's hospitals handle the thousands of cases.
Seventh, thousands of construction personnel raced against time to construct the 1000-bed Huoshenshan Infectious Disease Hospital 火神山新型冠状病毒感染肺炎专科医院 in a mere 10 days. A world’s first!
Eighth, Chinese TCM doctors worked along-side their western medical colleagues in treating COVID-19 patients. TCM herbal treatments had been proven effective.
Nineth, Chinese leaders did not shy away from admitting shortcomings in the handling of the pandemic. Even with their trying their personal and collective best, errors and misjudgments still occured. They documented the whole episode and learned from it, vowinig to do better the next time.
Tenth, when China was first under seige by the coronavirus in December 2019, she was almost alone in the fight. The western world was watching the development with glee, hoping that would destroy China’s growth, or at least, retard it. Fortunately, decades of facing hostilies and denials of assistance and cooperation from the West had strengthed China’s fortitude and resilience. When one searches the web today, he or she will still find hundreds of western media news and video clips mocking China with all kinds of accusastions and suspicious conspiracy theories.
Today, in Noverber 2021, while some parts of the world are still inundated by the coronavirus, China stands alone.
Has China vindicated herself sufficiently?
首先，中国经历了SARS，2003年她措手不及。她从痛苦的经历中吸取了教训，并发誓再也不会让病毒摧毁人们的生命。
第二，中国人是一个有凝聚力的群体。他们可以抛开个人差异，为国家的利益而共同努力。
第三，中国政府坚定地相信科学专家，如何应对这一流行病。
第四，中国政府是果断的。为了保护生命，她听取了科学建议，并决心以闪电般的速度关闭一座拥有1100万人口的城市，而不考虑经济和其他成本。对中国领导人来说，生命至关重要。代价包括面临西方对她侵犯人权的无情指控。关闭武汉市是人类从未有过的壮举。
第五，中国人很有凝聚力。动员和命令时，人们呆在家里。他们需要出门时都戴着口罩为家庭储备日用品。
第六，来自全国各地的数千名医务人员冒着人身安全的危险，赶赴武汉，帮助该市医院处理数千例病例。武汉是疫情早期的中心。
第七，数千名施工人员争分夺秒地在短短10天内建造了拥有1000张病床的火神山新型冠状病毒感染肺炎专科医院。 世界第一！
第八、新冠的中医药治疗，与中医同仁共同治疗。中医中药疗法已被证明是有效的。
第九，中国人毫不避讳地承认在应对疫情方面存在缺陷。即使他们尽了个人和集体的最大努力，错误和误判仍在发生。他们记录了整个事件并从中吸取教训，发誓下次会做得更好。
第十，2019年12月，当中国首次遭受冠状病毒袭击时，她几乎是孤军奋战。西方世界兴高采烈地注视着事态的发展，希望这会破坏中国的增长，或者至少会阻碍中国的增长。幸运的是，几十年来，面对来自西方的敌对和拒绝援助与合作，中国的坚韧不拔和韧性得到了增强。当你今天在网上搜索时，他或她仍然会发现数百条西方媒体的新闻和视频片段，用各种指责和可疑的阴谋论嘲弄中国。
今天，2021年11月，尽管世界上一些地区仍然被新冠所淹没，但中国却独自站着。
中国是否充分证明了自己的正确性？
David Bivans
Im not a fan of communism at all, but they did the right thing and followed the advice of the scientists.
They have shown that science works and stupidity does not.
我一点也不喜欢共产主义，但他们做了正确的事情，听从了科学家的建议。
他们已经证明，科学是有效的，而愚蠢是无效的。
Michael Ciao
It seemed elementary, humankind has done the same with all contagious diseases many times in 1,000s of years. You isolate the sick away from the healthy. You lock yourself at home so you don’t get in contact with the sick people.
What was puzzling was how come other countries didn’t know that? All regions of the world had similar experiences in the past.
这似乎很简单，人类在1000年的时间里对所有传染病都做了很多次同样的事情。你把病人和健康人隔离开来。你把自己锁在家里，这样你就不会和病人接触。
令人不解的是，为什么其他国家不知道这一点？世界所有区域过去都有类似的经历。
Tobias Jonch
The only innovative part of China’s handling of the pandemic was to forcefully quarantine their citizens by welding their doors shut, and I don’t believe any other country was inspired to follow suit.
中国应对流感大流行的唯一创新之处是通过关上门强制隔离本国公民，我不相信任何其他国家也会效仿。
Qi Chen
Or, you know, they also frozen any loan payments by the quarantine citizens.
Or, you know, they also mass tested the entire potentially infected region, down to the last individual.
Or, you know, they immediate informed all the individual in a community if even a single case showed up near their place.
Or, you know, they have check points and big data record of public movement, which means the moment someone is infected, they can track down who was in contact with that person over the past few days.
“Not capable and doesn’t have care enough” is quite different from “I don’t believe any other country was inspired to follow suit”.
或者，你应该知道，他们给被隔离公民提供了还款延期服务。
或者，你应该知道，他们还大规模测试了整个可能感染的区域，直到最后一个人。
或者，你应该知道，他们会立即通知社区中的所有人，即使只有一个病例出现在他们家附近。
或者，你应该知道，他们有检查点和公众运动的大数据记录，这意味着一旦有人被感染，他们就可以追查过去几天与此人接触的人。
“没有能力，也没有足够的关心”与“我不相信任何其他国家也会效仿”是完全不同的。
XueCheng Zhu
Yes, China has only done its part, and most countries have made a mess of the most basic ones.
是的，中国只做了自己该做的，大多数国家把最基本的部分搞得一团糟。
Richy T
Based on science, but not religious belief like the US.
基于科学，而不像美国那样基于宗教信仰。
很赞哦！ ()
