外国网友讨论中国福建舰航母正在测试弹射器

China's Type 003 supercarrier Fujian is testing its electromagnetic catapults - the ones that will launch carrier fighters into the air.

中国的003型超级航母福建目前正在测试其电磁弹射器，这是用于将舰载战斗机成功发射入空中的关键设备。

@fareschallah6773

Very informative video as usual mate- I personally believe that the tests are being conducted with a optimistic view for 2024 being the year all sea-worthiness tests will be conducted and I expect between Nov 24- feb 25 to be the commissioning date for the fujian

Incredible to see the fujian be completed in such break neck speeds and I suspect that once 004 is put assembled  then the electro magnetic launch system will be much quicker in installation and testing due to the learning process from the fujian’s EMALS system 

Great video as usual and I’m happy u also did a video on that new PLAN corvette ship that looks like the Swedish one

Exciting times to watch the  PLAN development- great video as usual buddy

像往常一样，非常信息丰富的视频，我个人认为测试正以乐观的态度进行，预计到2024年将进行所有的适航性测试，我期待福建号的投入使用日期在2024年11月至2025年2月之间。

令人难以置信地看到福建号如此迅速地完工，我怀疑一旦004号舰组装完成，电磁发射系统的安装和测试将会更加迅速，因为从福建号的电磁发射系统中吸取了教训。

像往常一样，很棒的视频，我很高兴你也做了一期关于那艘新的中国海军轻型护卫舰的视频，看起来很像瑞典的那一款。

看中国海军的发展真是激动人心的时刻，像往常一样，好视频伙计。

@phils4634

From that short video clip, that was a decent catapult launch too, suggesting the system works as intended.  Coming along very nicely indeed!

从那个短视频片段来看，这次弹射起飞相当不错，表明系统按预期运行。进展得非常顺利！

@wateryoung2997

China and US have taken two different technical paths in electromagnetic catapult development. China has adopted DC approach, while the United States has opted for (AC). Moreover, China's all-electric integrated system is more advanced than that of US, which is why China dares to deploy electromagnetic catapults on a conventionally powered aircraft carrier.

中国和美国在电磁弹射技术发展上选择了两条不同的道路。中国采用了直流（DC）的方法，而美国选择了交流（AC）的方法。此外，中国的全电一体化系统比美国更为先进，这也是为什么中国敢于在常规动力航母上部署电磁弹射装置的原因。

@benbo4394

I think that the Chinese emals would be more reliable given how China is heavily researching into maglev train which is similar to this but lighter

我认为中国的电磁弹射系统可能更可靠，因为中国正在大力研究类似但更轻的磁悬浮列车技术。

@kkhalifah1019

Coming along very nicely indeed. They have a huge task ahead of them, since new aircraft like the J35 and the KJ600 also need to be integrated with the carrier. Very steep learning curve given a lot of it are first-time experiences but if anyone can do it, it'll be the Chinese.

进展非常顺利。他们面临着艰巨的任务，因为新型飞机如J35和KJ600还需要与航母进行整合。考虑到其中很多都是第一次经历，学习曲线非常陡峭，但如果有人能够完成，那一定是中国人。

@bubbalo3388

Wonder if adding a catapult to less dramatic ramp design would help in launching aircraft by requiring a less powerful catapult system or able to launch heavier loaded planes. Like a hybrid system.

想知道在设计一个不那么引人注目的坡道时，是否加入弹射装置可以帮助使用功率较小的弹射系统，或者能够发射更重的飞机。就像是一种混合系统。

@jamesdu2044

Ford's problems stem from the fact America canceled land-testing rigs to "save costs" which has seen the cost of the Ford to more than double... That's like saving a few pennies to throw away dollars down the line, not to mention years wasted.

China specifically did not make those mistakes and has at least two carrier land testing installations.

福特公司的问题源于美国取消了陆地测试架，以“节省成本”，结果福特的成本翻了一番以上……这就好比是为了省几分钱而最终损失了数额庞大的美元，更不用说浪费了数年的时间。

中国则明智地避免了这些错误，至少拥有两个舰载机陆基测试设施。

@mbe2479

Is it possible that they are delaying these tests on purpose, while building several type-003 carriers at the same time? They just seem to move much slower than usual.

他们是否故意推迟这些测试，同时又在同时建造多艘003型航母？他们的进展似乎比往常缓慢许多。

@_Wai_Wai_

USA may have 11 carriers, on paper. But how many are operational at a time?  How many Regions do Americans want to cover around the world to maintain its Hegemony?  Looking at the state of American forces, (low recruitment numbers, poor physical health of many Americans such as Obesity etc...), are American forces actually ready to not only fight a war Far away across the Pacific Ocean, but also a multi-front War all around the world?

美国在文件上可能有11艘航母，但实际上有多少是处于可操作状态的？美国人想要覆盖全球多少地区以维持其霸权地位？从美国军队的现状来看（低招募人数，许多美国人身体状况不佳，例如肥胖等），美国军队是否真的准备好不仅在太平洋上远离的地方打一场战争，而且还要在全球范围内进行多线作战？

@samfernando5389

All the best, China ❤

祝中国一切顺利 ❤

@someopinion

Do modern carriers have significant armour? 

(not including mandatory armour)

现代航母是否配备有重要的装甲？

（不包括强制性的装甲）

@corpmex

To those who say china is ahead because of quickly trials came compared to the us, is say this. We are talking about incredibly complex electrical systems, requiring near limitless power (which fujian does not have). Throwing am object at full force with magnetic rail just means it works, doesnt mean it works for what you need it to do. The system essentially need to put out enough voltage while not destroying an aircraft upon launch. Thats like asking for someone to punch you at full force while not making me feel anything. These are technological leaps (with the exception of a few darpa porgrams) that no country has been able to achieve yet.

对于那些认为中国之所以领先是因为试验速度比美国快的人，我想说这样的观点并不成立。我们讨论的是极其复杂的电气系统，需要近乎无限的电力（福建并没有）。用磁轨全力抛出一个物体只是表示它能运作，但并不意味着它能完成你需要它完成的任务。这个系统基本上需要在发射时输出足够的电压，同时不摧毁飞机。这就像要求有人全力打你一拳，却不让你感觉到任何痛苦。这些都是技术上的飞跃，除了一些DARPA项目之外，尚无任何国家能够实现。

@user-ne6xw1sv4u

China haters blame China of lack of transparency. Here, we can see the electromagnetic catapults tests. Soon, they'll say the authoritarian Chinese authorities refuse to show the latest aircraft carrier type 003. 

一些中国的批评者指责中国缺乏透明度。然而，在这里，我们能够看到电磁弹射器的测试。不久后，他们可能会声称中国拒绝展示最新的003型航母。

@user-nh8zy4is3o

India's aircraft carriers are more advanced and of better quality.

印度的航空母舰更为先进且质量更优。

@jona.scholt4362

So when he talks about reliability issues with the Ford Class or with other US assets, why does he fail to mention that the USN discloses this information because it is accountable to its people. Does he think that the PLAN just doesn't experience any issues because they don't report them? As if the state propaganda would ever release anything but the most rosy of reports. The fact he doesn't do this or is ever skeptical of PLAN claims shows clear bias.

当他谈论福特级或其他美军装备存在的可靠性问题时，为何不提及美国海军披露此类信息是因为对人民负责呢？他是否认为中国海军没有问题是因为他们选择不报告？仿佛国家宣传只会发布最美好的报道一样。他从不怀疑中国海军的说法，这显示出明显的偏见。

@emacstacticalcom4105

The catapult(s) are the least of this ship's problems. Substandard steel was used, cracks and leaks are now showing up. It's becoming more and more evident that this ship, can't or won't stand up to much. The first one from Ukraine was and is more structurally sound. The EM Catapult was developed and designed from a thesis paper of a Chinese Student......and is plagued with problems from a technology that hasn't been demonstrated in china ..... that doesn't have enough power to supply said catapults with continuous power. China tried to marry a Kitty Hawk class carrier (which is what the Fujian is akin too) with modern (for china) naval tech. Its simply not working.

弹射器只是这艘舰船问题的一小部分。使用劣质钢材，现在出现了裂缝和泄漏。越来越明显的是，这艘舰船似乎难以承受太多。来自乌克兰的第一艘结构更为坚固。电磁弹射器是由一位中国学生的论文发展而来，现在却困扰着这一技术在中国尚未得到验证。而且，电力不足以为这些弹射器提供持续的动力。中国试图将福建号（类似于基地级航母）与现代（对中国而言是现代的）海军技术结合，但显然并不奏效。

@MarvinChenFantasy

It's like all happened overnight.

就像所有的事情都在一夜之间发生一样。

@timothyorendorff7642

Yes, their superiority is obvious, right? We’ll see.

是的，他们的优势显而易见，不是吗？我们拭目以待。

@lufasumafalu5069

US have no shipyard to build more ship as their current ships rusting due to overdeployment and lack of recruit to man the ships.

美国没有造船厂来建造更多的船，因为它们当前的船只由于过度部署和缺乏人手而生锈。

@marcosgavi

ADVANCE CHINA!!!

中国加油！

@shiweicai4872

Super cool.

太酷了。

@DK-ev9dg

China the most innovative and most powerful country in the world!!!

中国是世界上最具创新力和最强大的国家！

@wuhui

Wait I thought blogger is Chinese ? He pronounced Weibo incorrectly

等等，我以为博主是中国人？他把微博的发音说错了

@tx9ju

EMALS is only for countries that can make Maglev, America should import this technology from Japan

电磁弹射只适合那些能制造磁悬浮技术的国家，美国应该从日本进口这项技术

@honfmeilingfleet957

they can make their own and its more Modern than US Carrier that still using Steam Catalputl

他们可以自己制造，而且比仍在使用蒸汽弹射的美国航母更现代。

@stevenpulsinelli5553

Only the US had the system,  but someone as a spy gave them the technology. Who was it.?

只有美国拥有这个系统，但有人作为间谍向他们提供了技术。是谁呢？

@notyourtypical4915

Somewhere you start , like USA did for many years ago, so China doing good , if you don't start you never learn

有一些地方就是你开始的地方，就像多年前美国所做的一样，所以中国做得很不错。如果你不开始，就永远学不到。