杰克沙利文：中美关系的未来

National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan discusses U.S.-China relations and the Biden administration’s policy priorities for the relationship going forward. This event is co-organized by the 21st Century China Center at UC San Diego’s School of Global Policy and Strategy, as part of its annual China Forum.

国家安全顾问杰克·沙利文讨论了美中关系以及拜登政府对未来两国关系的政策重点。 本次活动由加州大学圣地亚哥分校全球政策与战略学院21世纪中国中心联合举办，作为其年度中国论坛的一部分。

@paytonmcdermott9111
I dont understand the animosity towards China. The US and china should be the best of friends and work to make the world safer and more prosperous. This focus on conflict only benefits the narrow interest of some members of the Anglo european ruling class.

我不理解对中国的敌意。美国和中国应该成为最好的朋友，共同努力使世界更安全、更繁荣。这种对冲突的关注只有利于盎格鲁-欧洲统治阶级中一些成员的狭隘利益。

@magnaviator
It's hard to justify jealousy. because it's such a sad and seedy obsession of small people with small imaginations.

很难为嫉妒辩护。因为这是那些想象力贫乏的小人的一种可悲而肮脏的痴迷。

@tuesdae666
Jealousy

嫉妒

@jimbopeebles8210
If you don’t understand trepidation towards China just ask Taiwanese and Philippine governments for their take.

如果你不理解对中国的恐惧，那就问问台湾（地区）和菲律宾的政府。

@paytonmcdermott9111
@jimbopeebles8210
Taiwan is a very singular case. The US, the People's Republic of China, and the Taiwanese authorities all recognize Taiwan and the mainland as being a part of China.
The previous president of the Philippines had good relations with China and was moving closer to them. The current president has gone in a very different direction.
They have some ongoing disputes over fishing rights as far as I know.

台湾（地区）是一个非常独特的例子。美国、中华人民共和国和台湾当局都承认台湾和大陆是中国的一部分。
菲律宾前总统与中国的关系很好，而且正在向中国靠拢。现任总统却走了一条截然不同的道路。
据我所知，他们在捕鱼权上有一些持续的争端。

@tomtsai1014
​ @jimbopeebles8210
Taiwan has a huge trade surplus with China. Philippines enjoys great infrastructure help from China until Marcos serves as an US vassals. All and all China's foreign policy is based on mutual respect and win win. The US has more than 100 military bases surrounding China. Who is the aggressor again?

台湾对中国大陆有着巨大的贸易顺差。菲律宾享受着来自中国的巨大基础设施帮助，直到马科斯成为美国的附庸。中国的外交政策始终是以相互尊重、互利共赢为基础的。美国在中国周边有100多个军事基地。谁是侵略者?

…………………………
@jerryfish09
It’s just wired to see a US-China relationship forum without any Chinese presence as speaker or panel

看到一个美中关系论坛没有任何中国人作为演讲者或小组成员，这是很奇怪的

@Ra-mx4bo
I don't have the patience to listen to his speech. Bs & uninspiring.

我没有耐心听他的演讲。废话连篇，无趣。

@hamzamahmood9565
Why would there be a Chinese presence? This is a discussion among Americans how they view their relationship with China over time. It's not an international stage or anything, just a talk at home

为什么要有中国人出席?这是一场美国人如何看待与中国关系的讨论。这不是一个国际舞台，只是一个国内的演讲

@zhuangdavid5037
I am a Chinese grown up in mainland China also living in US for long time,. just added my two cents reflecting opinions of my own

我是一个在中国大陆长大的中国人，也在美国生活了很长时间。我只是反映了我自己的观点

@SuperTiancai
This guy is so far from my expectation

这家伙完全出乎我的意料

@surfing_around
Why would there be Chinese presence? This is an American forum and think tank. The US think tanks discuss politics in the open – unlike your friends in the c**.

为什么要有中国人出席?这是一个美国论坛和智库。美国智库公开讨论政治——不像你的**党朋友。

………………………………
@zenist69
You want to hurt China and you want China to stop resist stop fighting back your hurting. What relationship u have in mind? SM?

你想伤害中国，却又想让中国停止抵抗，停止反击。你想要什么样的关系?虐待狂与受虐狂吗?

@zhuangdavid5037
In the face of the GENO.... in Gaza on Palestinians population and humanitarian nightmare, it made talks on xinjiang Uygers among thooe politicians uneasy, and brought shame to themselves. Even though this Jake guy may sound reasonable and practical towards China, yet what he talked about on this video is either political spinning rubbish, or under his own hypocrisy, he just tried to make US hypocritical and selfish foreign policy as triumphical as he would like to.

面对加沙地区的对巴勒斯坦人口的种族灭绝和人道主义噩梦，这让一些政客谈论xj人时感到不安，也给他们自己带来耻辱。尽管这个叫杰克的家伙对中国的态度听起来合理而务实，然而，他在这个视频中所说的要么是政治废话，要么就是以虚伪掩饰，他只是想让美国虚伪和自私的外交政策如他所想那般获胜。

@jdc3636
Unreal

不真实233

@talkinghand4839
What did Gaza's politicians and leaders do to bring this disaster to its people? Blame not just one side. Blame both sides.

加沙的政客和领导人做了什么，给人民带来了这场灾难?不要只责怪一方。双方都有责任。

@oceanb4838
​ @talkinghand4839
umm...if you would give me your house for free without a fight, i would agree with you.

嗯……如果你不跟我打架就把你的房子免费给我，我会同意的。

@josephdewuhan
Empty words in an attempt to spin.

言辞空洞，企图歪曲事实。

@user-ot5ki7vb1t
​ @talkinghand4839
Everyone knows the Palestine people are barred in the world largest concentration camp and their land has been occupied and their lives are suffering. You are talking about their rights to obxt this kind of suppression to them.

每个人都知道巴勒斯坦人民被关在世界上最大的集中营里，他们的土地被占领，他们的生活遭受苦难。你说的是他们反对这种镇压的权利。

………………………………
@user-og8ef6pf4s
Lie about China force labor

关于中国强迫劳工的谎言

@talkinghand4839
Do you have evidence proving that it is not? No? I didn't think so.

你有证据证明不是吗?没有?我不这么认为。

@kenxie6487
@talkinghand4839
There are just so plenty of them in youtube, both in English and Chinese. The thing is, people like you are too confident, and don't even bother to do a research.

油管上有很多这样的视频，有英文的也有中文的。问题是，像你这样的人太自信了，甚至懒得做调查。

@edwardchen9920
@talkinghand4839
It's quite interesting, this question should be asked by Chinese people. Most Americans have never been to China, and I guess it would be difficult for them to even point out China on a map. Yet, these people confidently criticize this and that about China.

这很有趣，这个问题应该由中国人来问。大多数美国人从未去过中国，我想他们甚至很难在地图上指出中国。然而，这些人自信地批评中国这个那个。

…………………………
@hydrogravix6924
The U.S. has always refused to engage with Africa citing concerns over environmental damage, human rights issues and non-democratic regimes. But now that China is making headway in Africa, the U.S.’s stance is to offer “more value” than what China can offer. China has always said it doesn’t involve itself in other countries’ politics. Perhaps America has learned a thing or two from China and changed its approach?

美国一直拒绝与非洲接触，理由是担心环境破坏、人权问题和非民主政权。但现在中国在非洲取得了进展，美国的立场是提供比中国所能提供的“更多的价值”。中国一直说自己不干涉别国的政治。也许美国已经从中国那里学到了一些东西，改变了自己的做法?

@jessereycruel7637
Naive to trust China.

天真地相信中国。

@user-du3gu2nm4q
@jessereycruel7637
who is naive. LM

谁才天真？笑死了

…………………………
@jsnjsn0723
The Chinese are patient enough to wait for the day when our American friends rationally calm down, because the Chinese like to make a planning cycle of fifty years, and the American friends like to make a consideration of an election cycle of four years.

中国人有足够的耐心等待我们的美国朋友理性冷静下来的那一天，因为中国人喜欢做一个五十年的规划周期，而美国朋友喜欢做一个四年选举周期的考虑。

@user-st3im5ge7f
Long talking, no valuable information.

叽叽歪歪，没有什么有价值的信息。

@talkinghand4839
We're not trained for a long attention span. After a few minutes, it becomes boring. For people finishing reading a book from cover to cover is rare.

我们没有受过长时间注意力训练。 几分钟后，就变得无聊了。 对于人们来说，从头到尾读完一本书的情况很少见。

@jlpa03
Can’t believe we have people like him determining what’s safe and right for us.

不敢相信我们有像他这样的人来决定什么对我们来说是安全和正确的。

@primeglobal6956
Which world he is talking about? Day dreaming at best.

他说的是哪个世界?充其量只是白日做梦。

@theinfralix6598
In any other country he would have a hard time in finding a real job in a real economy. But in the U.S. he is one of the most powerful men.

在其他任何国家，他都很难在真正的经济中找到一份真正的工作。但在美国，他是最有权势的人之一。

@Cle44139
Am I the only person that gets excited when we get a significant, thoughtful and hair-down conversation with Jake Sullivan? This is great.

难道只有我一个人在和杰克·沙利文进行一场意义重大，深思熟虑的谈话时感到兴奋吗?这太棒了。

@samael7867
minute 14: "we upgraded the relationship with vietman philipiens etc, yea, meanwhile china is building infrastructure and factories there, enhancing the life of hundret of millions of people, while the usa was buisy bombning several countries around the world. eather amarica is truning around theire foreign politics or it is just a superpower between china india and russia. sadly my beloved europe is going to be irr.
minute 16, china overcomming the USA in GDP will propably never come? it allready happend, if you dont count finace products and other "soft" economic segments, china is outproducing the usa in almost everything. just look how much steel the usa produces compaired to china. europe and the USA deindustrialiced and let china do the "dirty work" now we see, the finace marked doesnt feed bellys nor produces weapons, micro chips etc.

第14分钟：“我们提升了与越南、菲律宾等国的关系，与此同时，中国正在那里建设基础设施和工厂，改善了数以亿计的人民的生活，而美国正在轰炸世界上的几个国家。美国是在改变外交政策，还是只是中国、印度和俄罗斯之间的超级大国。可悲的是，我深爱的欧洲将被摧毁。
第16分钟，中国在GDP上超过美国肯定永远不会到来？如果不算金融产品和其他“软”经济领域，中国几乎在所有方面都超过了美国。看看美国的钢铁产量与中国相比有多少。欧洲和美国去工业化，让中国做“肮脏的工作”，现在我们看到，这些资金不是用来填饱肚子的，也不是用来生产武器、微芯片等的。

………………………………
@QUARTOPARTITO
For all the good talk and jokes, the questions remain: Is China today way more powerful than it was 3 years ago? And isn’t the US going in the opposite direction? And wouldn’t one bet the barn that China will be even more powerful in 3 years from now? LOL!!

尽管有这么多愉快的谈话和笑话，但问题依然存在:今天的中国比3年前强大多了吗?难道美国不是在反其道而行之吗?难道没有人敢打赌中国在三年后会更强大吗?哈哈! !

@user-yn5pv8uc2p
China's growth has been remarkable, starting from a very low base. Adding roads where there were no roads, building factories where there were no factories, building housing where there was no housing created amazing economic growth. Either a command economy or a free market economy would have produced those results under those circumstances. The problem is that the command economy had no market signals to reveal when marginal investment in roads, factories, and housing became non-productive. The marginal return on infrastructure investment in China has been negative for nearly a decade. The debt-to-GDP ratio is China is 3X worse than the US and will inevitably crash. Thanks to the one child policy, China has too few working age adults to fuel domestic consumption and too few working age adults to compete with other labor-rich countries like India to maintain their export-led business model. Unfortunately, the people of China will have to throw off the yoke of the c** and find a new way to govern themselves before they will ever meet their potential.

中国从一个很低的起点开始，取得了令人瞩目的增长。在没有路的地方修路，在没有工厂的地方建工厂，在没有房子的地方盖房子，创造了惊人的经济增长。在这种情况下，无论是计划经济还是自由市场经济都会产生这样的结果。问题在于，当道路、工厂和住房的边际投资变成非生产性投资时，计划经济没有市场信号来显示。近10年来，中国基础设施投资的边际回报率一直为负。中国的债务与GDP之比是美国的三倍，不可避免地会bk。由于独生子女政策，中国的适龄劳动人口太少，无法推动国内消费，也无法与印度等劳动力丰富的国家竞争，维持出口导向型的商业模式。不幸的是，中国人民必须摆脱***的枷锁，找到一种新的管理自己的方式，才能发挥自己的潜力。

@PC-ee7tz
No, C.... has been much worse than 3 years ago, and will be continuing its downward path in the future 3 years. Just Look at its dismal birth rate, collapsing real estate, ever increasing unemployment, etc. 2024 will be the best year in next 10. You can bet on it!

不，c比3年前糟糕得多，未来3年还会继续走下坡路。看看它令人沮丧的出生率，崩溃的房地产，不断增加的失业率，等等。2024年将是未来十年中最好的一年。你可以打赌!

@talkinghand4839
Yeah, now they have so many. What to do with extra homes, factories, emptied airports, etc. HMMm

是的，现在他们有太多的问题了。如何处理多余的房屋、工厂、空空如也的机场等?嗯

@moyoyo7575

@PC-ee7tz 是的 生育率下降。所以美国的生育率是来自自己生的？还是边境几千万翻墙过来的？

………………………………
@Voxabonable
What makes you think only you can decide and only you can have the final say in any relationship?

你凭什么认为只有你能决定，只有你能在任何关系中有最终决定权?

@xiaozhuHN
I just say one thing, Taiwan is part of China, it is the consensus of the people in China, it's not just the government's view. The Chinese people have suffered a lot in history, especially when Japan invaded China in modern times. The Chinese all have the feelings of family and country, there is no home without country.The US goverment should understand this.

我只想说一件事，台湾是中国的一部分，这是中国人民的共识，这不仅仅是政府的观点。中国人民在历史上遭受了很多苦难，尤其是近代日本侵略中国时。中国人都有家国情怀，没有国就没有家。美国政府应该理解这一点。

@zhuangdavid5037
30 million (20 million by US congress library) lives of Chinese people lost fighting Japanese invasion, only got back Taiwan and a few islands in South China Sea

3000万（美国国会图书馆2000万）中国人民在抗日战争中丧生，只收复了台湾和南中国海的几个岛屿

@spiritofgoldfish
Mainstream ideology has twisted the meaning of "free market" into the opposite of what the classical economists like Adam Smith intended. The classical economists defined a free market as free FROM economic rents (unearned income), extracted by feudal landlords. The classical role of government is to keep natural monopolies in the public domain and tax away economic rents to use it to lower the cost of production. This is done through subsidies for such things as public infrastructure, education, and health care, not raising the cost of living and therefore the cost of labor, as with neoliberal monopolistic privatization.

主流意识形态扭曲了“自由市场”的含义，使之与亚当·斯密等古典经济学家的意图背道而驰。古典经济学家将自由市场定义为不受封建地主掠夺的经济租金（非劳动收入）的影响。政府的传统角色是保持公共领域的自然垄断，并对经济租金征税，以利用它来降低生产成本。这是通过对公共基础设施、教育和医疗保健等方面的补贴来实现的，而不是像新自由主义垄断私有化那样提高生活成本，从而提高劳动力成本。

Mainstream Austrian and Libertarian Chicago School neoliberals have no role for the government in the economy, leaving the market free FOR economic rents, extracted by monopolies and the banks (FIRE, finance, insurance, and real estate). Because the economy does not stay out of government, the result is rule by the rentier oligarchy, otherwise called feudalism.
These two approaches, industrial capitalism and financial capitalism, are what the new cold war is all about, and it is the story of financial capitalism sucking ever more life out of once vibrant US industrial capitalism.

主流奥地利学派和自由主义芝加哥学派的新自由主义者认为政府在经济中没有任何作用，让市场自由地产生由垄断企业和银行(消防、金融、保险和房地产)榨取的经济租金。因为经济不能脱离政府，结果是由食利者寡头统治，或者被称为封建主义。
工业资本主义和金融资本主义这两种方式是新冷战的全部内容，也是金融资本主义从曾经充满活力的美国工业资本主义中吸取更多生命的故事。

“It is suggested that the tipping point for being a rentier economy is when 40 per cent of income comes from rent. Even if just interest and dividends are counted as rent, the USA is already at that point.”
Standing, Guy. The Corruption of Capitalism (p. 114). 2016

“有人认为，成为食利者经济的临界点是40%的收入来自租金。即使只把利息和股息算作租金，美国也已经到了这个地步。”
《资本主义的腐败》(第114页)。2016

@harryloo8544
Mentions Red Sea but not Israel in Gaza. Lame.

提到了红海，但没有提到在加沙地带的以色列。站不住脚的。

@jimbopeebles8210
It’s nice to hear level headed dialogue about this relationship. So much of the discourse is littered with hyperbole, rhetoric and disinformation in online spaces.
It is clear that AI and other technologies have been levered to distort the reality of a mostly cooperative yet sometimes contentious competition

很高兴听到关于这段关系的冷静对话。许多言论充斥着网络空间中的夸张、花言巧语和虚假信息。
很明显，人工智能和其他技术被利用来扭曲了一种主要是合作，但有时存在争议的竞争的现实。

@zhinan888
Jake is arrogant and saying nothing

沙利文很傲慢，什么也不说

@khurram4589
Financial planning is like navigation. If you know where you are and where you want to go, navigation isn't such a great problem. It's when you don't know the two points that it's difficult!!!

财务规划就像航海。如果你知道你在哪里，你想去哪里，导航不是一个大问题。只有当你不知道这两点的时候才会觉得困难!!

@mianumar7188
Now with the recent economy, To get Financial FREEDOM you have to be making money while you're asleep.

在最近的经济形势下，要想获得财务自由，你必须在睡觉的时候赚钱。

@emiliayulia1520
True though unfortunately mine always end up with losses

没错，但不幸的是我的总是以失败告终

@isabellaliu8409
Appeasement can’t really avoid conflict!

绥靖并不能真正避免冲突!

@pengwang6300
Didn't have time to go thru the whole seminar. The politicians might want to learn how American architects did so many skyscrapers in China even without local architectural registration, and how Builk made billions dollars of profits in China a year without paying a single dollar of tax by registering their entity in Virgin island.

没时间看完整个研讨会。政客们可能想了解美国建筑师是如何在没有当地建筑注册的情况下在中国建造这么多摩天大楼的，以及Builk是如何通过在维尔京群岛注册其实体，在不缴纳一美元税款的情况下，每年在中国赚取数十亿美元的利润的。

@oilnfire
Still anyone out there believing this guy's shit talk??

还有人相信这家伙的鬼话吗??

@kennyy3085
They’re not talking about the US-China relationship, instead they’re talking how to maintain the US hegemony by restraining a rising China.
Hegemony and interests are US’s primacy. To achieve this goal, US can beat Soviet unx, Japan and EU. Now it’s China while the next may be India lol

他们不是在谈论美中关系，而是在谈论如何通过遏制崛起的中国来维持美国的霸权。
美国的霸权和利益至上。为了实现这一目标，美国可以击败苏联、日本和欧盟。现在是中国，下一个可能是印度2333

………………………………
@zhuangdavid5037
Actually, Americans including many politicians and vocal social elites, have a lot to learn about China and various aspect of Chinese civilization, not only help solving many domestic issues currently so severe in USA, also Daoism and Confucius thinking to solve so many conflicts and wars in the world, also reposition USA with different kind orientation, other than Monroe Doctrine mentality which is still so strongly believed by people in US administration and congress, as part of their proud past and guidelines for modern world

实际上，美国人，包括许多政治家和有声音的社会精英，对中国和中国文明的各个方面都有很多需要学习的地方，不仅有助于解决美国目前如此严重的国内问题，也有助于道教和孔子思想解决世界上如此多的冲突和战争，还可以用不同的方向重新定位美国，而不是门罗主义的心态，门罗主义仍然被美国政府和国会的人如此强烈地相信，作为他们骄傲的过去和现代世界的指导方针的一部分。

@robgronsky4466
Dont disagree about much of America having a lot to learning from Chinas civilization but the com...st Party has a great deal to learn about Democracy. Governance is complex.

不要不同意美国有很多东西要从中国文明中学习，但**党在民主方面有很多东西要学。治理是复杂的。

@zhuangdavid5037
​​ @robgronsky4466
true, there are lots of things to learn from USA at people level as well many aspects of political system

没错，在人民层面和政治制度的许多方面，有很多东西值得向美国学习

@zhuangdavid5037
Unlike Europeans, folks in USA didn't have similar experience of equal and peaceful exchanges with Chinese civilization, which benefited European civilization in many ways, such as silk making, porcelain making, paper and printing technologies, not to mention gun power and compass

与欧洲人不同，美国人没有与中国文明平等、和平交流的经历，后者在很多方面使欧洲文明受益，比如丝绸、瓷器、造纸和印刷技术，更不用说枪支和指南针了

@talkinghand4839
China's old civilization is not the same as today. The *** is a different animal.

中国古代文明与今天的不同。***是另一种动物。

………………………………
@starfish253
This is after his 3-day meeting with Wang Yi in Bangkok? At least it sounds like US is trying to dampen the situation a bit

这是在他与王毅在曼谷举行为期3天的会谈之后?至少听起来美国在试图缓和局势

@deepblue7457
and tell Jake “I don’t want to see a war erupting with China. I’m too old to be a war-time president.”

告诉杰克：“我不想看到与中国爆发战争。我太老了，当不了战时总统。”

@rajakegelapan8498
This is like a rich boss, who saw that his poor workers were now getting richer, and started his own business and outperformed his boss. The boss feels jealous and dissatisfied with why his workers are now more successful and live more prosperously than his family

这就像一个有钱的老板，看到他的穷工人现在越来越有钱，就自己创业，业绩超过了他的老板。老板感到嫉妒和不满，为什么他的工人现在比他的家人更成功，生活得更富裕

@freydont
Gives me confidence.

给了我信心

@edtoh3754
Full of bullshit

全是扯淡

@donkeychan491
The most advanced chips are not only not "crucial to the military" they are totally and utterly irrelevant since they aren't used! How can anyone take this guy seriously if he spouts such uninformed rubbish?

最先进的芯片不仅不是“对军队至关重要”，而且完全无关紧要，因为没用它们！如果他滔滔不绝地说这些无知的废话，怎么会有人把他当回事呢?

@changyang7982
New president will dump the shit talk right away

新总统会马上抛弃这些废话的

@martine2al
Jake is intelligent and trustworthy! Cannot imagine the Biden's administration without him.

杰克既聪明又值得信赖!无法想象没有他的拜登政府。

@justdoit0542
This is not accurate. China’s GDP is greater than US’s if you leave out only military sector. All other sectors combined, China’s is greater. US has a huge military industry, no other countries can even imagine to compete with.

这是不准确的。如果不考虑军事部门，中国的GDP超过美国。所有其他行业加起来，中国的规模更大。美国拥有庞大的军事工业，没有其他国家可以想象与之竞争。

@samueljeffries8671
Jake is a boss, one of the greatest of his generation.

杰克是老板，是他那一代最杰出的老板之一。

@zhinan888
Really?

真的吗？

@donkeychan491
A bit of a vacant and vacuous airhead but, yeah, by American standards probably a towering intellect.

有点空虚和空洞的傻瓜，但是，没错，按照美国人的标准，可能是一个杰出的智者。

@user-cq6wn9rs3v
Us please mind your own business

美国请少管闲事

@jamesruscheinski8602
divine central authority unity take over international law

神圣的中央权威统一接管了国际法

@afterglow5285
The chips act will fail miserably

《芯片法案》将惨败

@donkeychan491
The FT already published an article saying the West has to prepare for the coming flood of Chinese chips!

英国《金融时报》已经发表了一篇文章，称西方必须为即将到来的中国芯片洪流做好准备!

@EricVoegelin
CFR seminars are useless. No information, no insight.

CFR研讨会毫无用处。没有信息，就没有洞察力。

@JohnKan-uo7ne
One China is yet to come. Today, PRC is one China. ROC is also one China

一个中国尚未到来。今天，中华人民共和国是一个中国。““中华民国””也是一个中国

…………………………
@vasylbilatchuk
China successfully appointing two US presidents O and B.

中国成功任命了两位美国总统，奥观海和拜振华。

@zhuangdavid5037
some said it's Trump, lol

有人说是特朗普，哈哈

…………………………
@johnhoward6393
Roosevelt had Harry Hopkins and Biden has Anthony blxen and Jake Sullivan.

罗斯福有哈里·霍普金斯，拜登有安东尼·布林肯和杰克·沙利文。

@answerwu2011
summary up:
1 China is bad
2 US is good

总结:
1 .中国不好
2 .美国很好
哈哈哈

@soldiersvejk2053
So now you care about Musli...?

所以你现在关心穆斯林了?

@Sam-lw8og
Mr.Jack is the foolish and close door thinking person, he doesn't think about environment change just himself.

杰克先生是一个愚蠢而封闭的人，他不考虑环境的变化，只考虑自己。

@odin5166
US foreign policy is basically I say you do and if not I sanction.

美国的外交政策基本上是我说你做，否则我制裁。

@zhuangdavid5037
super. version of Monroe doctrine

超级版门罗主义

@brucec1090
He can't even talk straight. A bully trying to justify why he is a bully.

他连话都说不清楚。一个恶霸试图证明他为什么是恶霸。

@GPDC100
Try to bully where US can bully

美国能欺负的地方就尽量欺负

@tonywyli
Lies after lies after lies. In the end, they didn't accomplish anything.

一个又一个的谎言。最后，他们什么也没做成。

@hypocritehater1673
As usual,rubbish talk ,no substance,shame on you hypocrites

跟往常一样，废话连篇，没有实质内容，你们这些伪君子真可耻

@ricotheman8139
My cat had a more meaningful and inspiring speech this morning. She said meow meow meow. And I instantly understood what she meant.

我的猫今天早上说了一段更有意义、更鼓舞人心的话。她说喵喵喵。我立刻明白了她的意思。

@jukio02
The US cannot defeat China because China is too big and has too many relationships with other countries. If the US completely decouples from China, China would be fine, because they trade with many other countries. It would in fact hurt the US more. That's why the US will never decouple, cause they know this to be true. It's why Russia is still going strong because they trade with other countries, and behind closed doors they are still trading with the west.

美国无法打败中国，因为中国太大了，与其他国家的关系太多了。如果美国与中国完全脱钩，中国会没事的，因为他们与许多其他国家进行贸易。事实上，这对美国的伤害更大。这就是为什么美国永远不会脱钩，因为他们知道这是真的。这就是为什么俄罗斯仍然强大，因为他们与其他国家进行贸易，他们仍然在闭门不出地与西方进行贸易。